# HG changeset patch
# User Paul Boddie <paul@boddie.org.uk>
# Date 1556832067 -7200
# Node ID 427811b05deae7338be3ebca2d03aee7a3c7db7e
# Parent  b572f8cd14769f9fb11e1783696ca1a1b0047856
Moved the VGA output examples summary to a separate document.

diff -r b572f8cd1476 -r 427811b05dea README.txt
--- a/README.txt	Mon Apr 15 17:53:50 2019 +0200
+++ b/README.txt	Thu May 02 23:21:07 2019 +0200
@@ -101,39 +101,6 @@
 
 
 
-VGA Output Example Comparison
-=============================
-
-In investigating different techniques, the following observations have been
-made about the behaviour of the different VGA examples:
-
-            DMA       Horizontal  Picture   Pixel       Scrolling
-            Channels  Resolution  Stability Consistency Operational
-            --------  ----------  --------- ----------- -----------
-vga         1         High        No        No          Yes
-vga-cpu     0         High        Yes       Yes         Yes
-vga-dual    2         High        No        No          No
-vga-pmp     1         High        No        No          Yes
-vga-timer   2         Low         Yes       Yes         Yes
-
-Here, picture stability is assessed with the CPU accessing RAM. In general,
-all of the approaches can provide stable pictures with limited RAM access
-loading. However, under load, the picture will stretch and ripple for all
-examples where picture stability is given as "No".
-
-It should be noted that the vga-timer example employs two DMA channels, but
-this is only to maximise horizontal resolution. With a single channel,
-horizontal resolution is diminished still further in comparison to the other
-examples.
-
-It would appear that two most viable approaches are the vga-cpu and vga-timer,
-if only because they produce consistently-sized pixels, retain picture
-stability under load, and provide operational horizontal scrolling. These
-approaches provide a tradeoff between performance (vga-timer being faster) and
-resolution (vga-cpu being better).
-
-
-
 References
 ==========
 
diff -r b572f8cd1476 -r 427811b05dea docs/wiki/CommonPIC32
--- a/docs/wiki/CommonPIC32	Mon Apr 15 17:53:50 2019 +0200
+++ b/docs/wiki/CommonPIC32	Thu May 02 23:21:07 2019 +0200
@@ -6,4 +6,5 @@
 
 == Documentation ==
 
+ * [[VGA Output Examples]]
  * [[VGA Signal Output]]
diff -r b572f8cd1476 -r 427811b05dea docs/wiki/VGA_Output_Examples
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/docs/wiki/VGA_Output_Examples	Thu May 02 23:21:07 2019 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+= VGA Output Example Comparison =
+
+In investigating different techniques, the following observations have been
+made about the behaviour of the different VGA examples:
+
+{{{#!table
+          || DMA Channels || Horizontal Resolution || Picture Stability
+          || Pixel Consistency || Scrolling Operational
+==
+vga       || 1 || High || No  || No  || Yes
+==
+vga-cpu   || 0 || High || Yes || Yes || Yes
+==
+vga-dual  || 2 || High || No  || No  || No
+==
+vga-pmp   || 1 || High || No  || No  || Yes
+==
+vga-timer || 2 || Low  || Yes || Yes || Yes
+}}}
+
+Here, picture stability is assessed with the CPU accessing RAM. In general,
+all of the approaches can provide stable pictures with limited RAM access
+loading. However, under load, the picture will stretch and ripple for all
+examples where picture stability is given as "No".
+
+It should be noted that the vga-timer example employs two DMA channels, but
+this is only to maximise horizontal resolution. With a single channel,
+horizontal resolution is diminished still further in comparison to the other
+examples.
+
+It would appear that two most viable approaches are the vga-cpu and vga-timer,
+if only because they produce consistently-sized pixels, retain picture
+stability under load, and provide operational horizontal scrolling. These
+approaches provide a tradeoff between performance (vga-timer being faster) and
+resolution (vga-cpu being better).